Parsing
Extracting names, dates, work history and other text into fields. Greenhouse documents formatting and file problems that can leave details incomplete.
- Greenhouse parsing documentation ↗Vendor documentation · Greenhouse Recruiting
Apply with a clear case for the role, a résumé that is easy to read and evidence you can stand behind. Use this guide for the application, the screening process and the conversations around it.
Based on current vendor documentation, university career guidance and official resources. Employer instructions come first. Suggested routines and examples are editorial choices; they do not guarantee a screening result.
Download the application workbook ↓Save the live job description and check the employer’s own careers page. Separate essential credentials and working constraints from preferences. In the workbook’s Role fit sheet, match each important requirement to evidence or an honest gap.
Keep a full record of your work, then select the most relevant achievements for this application. Use the employer’s terminology where it accurately describes your experience. Keep official titles, dates and qualifications consistent across the form, résumé and profile.
For each key claim, show the problem, your contribution and a result you can support. Quantify only when you have a defensible number; a concrete qualitative result is useful too. If a cover letter is requested, explain the fit using one or two relevant examples.
Follow the employer’s file and AI-use instructions. Read any auto-filled fields, answer screening questions accurately and correct errors before submitting. Save the version used, confirmation and next action. A successful upload is only one part of the check.
Alongside the application, ask a person who knows your work for a specific introduction or insight when appropriate. For a new contact, ask about the work and respect their time. Use the employer’s referral process; a referral does not replace required application steps.
Track applications, conversations, interviews and follow-ups separately. Follow the employer’s stated timeline; where appropriate, send one concise follow-up. Review weak points with a career adviser. Our suggested weekly review is a planning choice, not a proven application quota.
An applicant tracking system (ATS) can support several parts of hiring. Some features extract text, others apply rules or assist a reviewer. These are documented examples from Greenhouse; they are not a description of every employer’s setup.
Extracting names, dates, work history and other text into fields. Greenhouse documents formatting and file problems that can leave details incomplete.
An employer may configure automatic actions based on application answers. Greenhouse’s auto-reject feature is one documented example.
Greenhouse’s September 2026 documentation describes matching against employer-defined criteria. That feature does not itself automatically advance or reject candidates.
Recruiters assess the application in the employer’s process. The configuration of one vendor’s product does not establish how every employer screens applicants.
A quick rejection does not tell you which mechanism was responsible. Focus on accurate answers, readable information and evidence relevant to the role. A universal “ATS pass score” would not capture the employer-specific process described here.
A single-column résumé with standard headings is a conservative choice. Keep important details in the document body; avoid making graphics, text boxes or headers carry essential information. This recommendation responds to documented parser failure modes, not a guarantee about every system.
Use the format and size limit named in the application. A text-based PDF or DOCX may be accepted; neither is universally best. As a basic sanity check, copy the text into a plain-text editor and inspect the order, then verify the actual application fields.
Spell out relevant acronyms on first use and connect skills to the work you did. Add a useful description of an unfamiliar title without changing the official title. Do not add qualifications you lack, invisible text, keyword repetition or instructions directed at an AI reviewer.
If you use a commercial résumé checker, inspect its specific suggestions and privacy terms. Our judgment: a score is not proof that an employer will shortlist you, because you do not know its settings or complete selection process. A manual job-to-evidence comparison is a free alternative.
Ask for gaps, clarity problems and suggested wording based only on facts you provide. Review every change, retain your own voice and be ready to explain every claim. Observe any application policy on AI; do not use it secretly during an assessment.
Open your final file and sample links as a recipient would. If extraction or an assessment creates an access problem, use the employer’s listed support or accommodation channel. Read its privacy notice and any available review options; do not assume every employer offers the same process.
Check the employer’s policy first. This works as a manual review checklist too. If using an external service, share only information you are comfortable providing under its terms.
Compare this job description with the factual experience notes below. Make a table with: requirement, supporting evidence, missing evidence, and a suggested wording change. Do not invent experience, qualifications, dates or metrics. Flag uncertainty and ask questions where evidence is missing. Keep official titles and dates unchanged. Do not assign an ATS score or claim that the application will pass screening. Job description: [paste permitted text] My experience: [paste a version without confidential or unnecessary personal details]
Name the role or problem you want to work on, the people you help and a strength you can evidence. Editorial template: ‘I help [type of team] solve [problem], drawing on [relevant experience].’ Test whether someone in the field understands it.
Align your headline, summary and recent experience with the same target. Make your current interests clear, keep dates and claims consistent, and choose the visibility you are comfortable with. A paid profile upgrade is optional.
Curate a few relevant case studies: context, your decisions, contribution, outcome and limits. Use work you can share or a clearly labeled fictional exercise. LinkedIn Featured can display samples; provide a separate accessible link for readers who are not signed in.
Ask for specific feedback, introductions or permission to name a reference. Give people the role context and a brief reminder of work they saw you do. Make a request easy to decline and send a useful update when their advice helps.
Share an explanation, lesson or small example relevant to your target field when you have something useful to contribute. A professional association or a direct conversation can serve the same purpose. Our advice is to judge relevance and conversations, not posting frequency or follower totals.
Practise your career story and two examples that demonstrate judgment. Explain a layoff briefly and factually, then connect your experience to the role. Track commitments, reply professionally and compare a written offer with your actual requirements.
Use the free workbook for role fit, application tracking, achievement evidence and offer comparison. For a second opinion, start with public employment support or agree on a defined review with a career practitioner.
Links above identify the sources beside each recommendation. Vendor documentation explains the named product, not the whole job market. A university guide being public does not make its appointment services available to everyone. No affiliate links.
Browse the full support and tools library → · Return to the career planner →